Sherwood Anderson’s Winseburg,
Ohio revolves much around the grotesque. The Oxford Dictionary defines the
noun grotesque as “a very ugly or distorted figure, creature, or image.”
Anderson seems to use the term to describe characters that are crippled emotionally
and spiritually. In the novel, many characters can be considered grotesques due
to their apparent lack of ability to discern the difference between appearance
and dark realities. We are first introduced to the concept of the grotesque in
the first chapter of the novel, “The Book of the Grotesque.” Through the old
man in the story, Anderson divulges the idea that truth turns people into
grotesques. “It was his notion that the moment one of the people took one of
the truths to himself, called it his truth, and tried to life is life by it, he
became a grotesque, and the truth he embraced became a falsehood.” (Anderson
5). Most of the stories that ensue present the audience with an array of
characters that can be considered grotesques, the first of which is Wing
Biddlebaum.
Wing can be considered a grotesque because of the way he feels about
his hands. The hands are his distinguishing feature and “the source of his
fame,” yet he does his best to keep them hidden, “forever striving to conceal
themselves in his pockets or behind his back.” (Anderson 9). The source of the shame
and dislike of his own hands dates back to his days as a schoolteacher, when he
was accused of inappropriately touching his pupils and was chased from Pennsylvania.
The “touching” was only, in fact, Wing’s approach at sharing his truth with his
students. He wanted them to dream, rather than live their lives in conformity.
The incident left Wing a grotesque, living in Winesburg, unable to reconnect
with society.
The grotesque is also paramount in “The Strength of God.” Curtis
Hartman, the grotesque in the story, is a local reverend/preacher. Priests are
commonly accepted to be prime examples of morally upright human beings.
Reverend Curtis can be considered a grotesque because he finds pleasure in
viewing the bare skin of Kate Swift, distorting the image usually associated
with religious men. The reverend
discovers that his “truth” is the suppressed lust he has kept within him.
What these characters have in common is that they both centered their
life on a truth—a truth of their own. By doing this, both characters became
grotesques, distorted figures of the image they were before. Through this,
change, they went from ideal images to real characters. They lost an innocence
that was central to their identity. Wing was a teacher, an image associated
with parenting and upbringing. Curtis is a priest, an image associated with a
perfect example of moral righteousness. Yet because of their truths, each
became a grotesque, a distorted figure of the perfect image associated with
their roles in society. Through this change, however, they also became more
real—more human. We can therefore infer that reality is what makes people
grotesques.
In your introduction, I really liked the phrase "characters crippled emotionally and spiritually" you used to describe the grotesque characters in Winesburg, Ohio. It is undeniable that the grotesques in Winesburg all have a protruding flaw that makes people uncomfortable to face or look at. The flaw is internal but in the book, it becomes a disturbing physical mark that other characters can perceive. To list a few examples of the characters with distinct physical characteristics that make them grotesques are, Elizabeth Willard (ghostly bent figure, ugly), Alice Hindman (lost her beauty after becoming grotesque), and Wash Willard (who is hideous and disturbing in every way). Therefore, when the characters become grotesque they become an image and representation for other characters to witness in order to keep themselves from becoming grotesque. However, due to the overwhelmingly desirous temptation of truth, almost all the characters fail to keep themselves from grabbing onto truth. The exception is George because he has youth and guidance to overcome the temptation. Anyways, I just wanted to comment because the phrase you used really stuck out to me. The fact that the characters have emotional flaws but their flaws are portrayed physically was interesting. :)
ReplyDelete